yeah, it was ignorant of me to assume this thread was talking about a movie. i realize now the movie, profits, even the bully that produced it, has nothing to do with bullying or what tater posted in his original post. i don't even know why i brought the movie up.
maybe james should split this into a separate thread so i don't "hijack" this one any further.
_________________________________________________. ..............................................I do not support this ad.
If you read the first post in this thread it is clear I was speaking of the subject matter of the movie. Ignorance is one thing...but intentionally twisting the subject is called trolling. You have yet to comment on the subject matter. Are you interested in the subject matter of bullying or is your main interest to continue diverting us from that topic? I would bet that if most anyone else had started this thread, you and Michael wouldn't have responded like this. I have to agree with FreeWorldOrder about Michael. I'll add that if you look at most of his posts, he's not commenting on the subject matter of the threads, but insulting people instead, ridiculing and putting people done. A prime example of a bully.
_________________________________________________. ..............................................I do not support this ad.
Moderators...can we get this thread back on topic please? Those that don't want to say on topic could find another thread.
I'd suggest returning to the topic. Though I'd also say that could be bullying or how the movie reflects on that in society.
Doesn't seem like anyone wants to be on topic, so it's probably best just to close the thread.
Bookmarks